Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  7
 Total visitors :  7450322

Conflict of Interests and Evidence Base for GM Crops Safety Research
Thursday, 2015/02/19 | 16:17:44

http://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/files/images/2015-02-18-103.jpgPublished research have consistently proven the safety of GM crops, however, critics still doubt GMOs, citing other studies with possibly compromised results due to bias caused by conflicts of interest (COIs). Dr. Miguel Angel Sanchez, Executive Director of ChileBio, studied published peer-reviewed articles on GM safety to learn the extent of literature related to safety. He also analyzed the papers for COIs. Financial COIs are those where the research is funded by a company linked with GM crop development while professional COIs occur if an author is connected with a company developing GM crops. 

 

The publications were grouped according to the objective of the study. The animal health category had the most reports with 204. Allergenicity potential had 46 articles, while mycotoxins and processing accounted for only 18 papers each. He also found that 58.3 percent of the papers had no COIs, while 25.8 percent had COIs either in terms of the author affiliation or the declared funding source.

 

He concluded that GM safety issues have been and continue to be extensively studied with the number of original research reports increasing over the past years. Different aspects of GM food/ feed safety have also been addressed, and animal health is the most frequently studied topic.  He also confirmed that majority of reports have no conflict from author affiliation and funding source. It is also important to mention that the analysis revealed that less than 5 percent of all reports had negative outcomes.

 

For more information, read the full article in Nature Biotechnology.

Back      Print      View: 809

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Beyond genes: Protein atlas scores nitrogen fixing duet
  • 2016 Borlaug CAST Communication Award Goes to Dr. Kevin Folta
  • FAO and NEPAD team up to boost rural youth employment in Benin, Cameroon, Malawi and Niger
  • Timely seed distributions in Ethiopia boost crop yields, strengthen communities’ resilience
  • Parliaments must work together in the final stretch against hunger
  • Empowering women farmers in the polder communities of Bangladesh
  • Depression: let’s talk
  • As APEC Concludes, CIP’s Food Security and Climate Smart Agriculture on Full Display
  • CIAT directly engages with the European Cocoa Industry
  • Breeding tool plays a key role in program planning
  • FAO: Transform Agriculture to Address Global Challenges
  • Uganda Holds Banana Research Training for African Scientists and Biotechnology Regulators
  • US Congress Ratifies Historic Global Food Security Treaty
  • Fruit Fly`s Genetic Code Revealed
  • Seminar at EU Parliament Tackles GM Crops Concerns
  • JICA and IRRI ignites a “seed revolution” for African and Asian farmers
  • OsABCG26 Vital in Anther Cuticle and Pollen Exine Formation in Rice
  • Akira Tanaka, IRRI’s first physiologist, passes away
  • WHO calls for immediate safe evacuation of the sick and wounded from conflict areas
  • Farmer Field School in Tonga continues to break new ground in the Pacific for training young farmers

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD