Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  19
 Total visitors :  7450023

Plant-based and Cultured Cell Have the Least Environmental Impact Among Meat Alternatives
Thursday, 2023/04/20 | 09:09:46

To construct analyses on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates, and unintended trade-offs associated with meat substitutes in the global food system, an inter-European team of scientists detailed the potential variations in the processing level of six types of meat alternative based on factors like greenhouse gasses, land use, non-renewable energy use, and water footprint in their ingredients. Of the six, plant-based meat substitute and cultured meat were found to produce less environmental footprints.

 

The study was done by analyzing 3,800 articles found in an online database that published studies in the last decade. These were narrowed down to a selection of original studies published in scientific journals in the English language. The key findings of the review by the scientists from Germany, Austria, and Finland are:

 

  1. Plant-based meat substitutes have a low resource demand and environmental impact as this alternative requires minimal processing of its raw materials and other product components.
  2. Application of alternative/underutilized and wild animals for conventional meat production is not justifiable in terms of environmental impact despite being a source of important nutrients for local rural populations. However, the use of animal-derived components like milk, if considered as secondary byproduct, might be feasible.
  3. Cultured meat has the potential to lower environmental impacts compared to livestock products if the production process is scaled up in a cost-efficient way and if production uses low-emission energy sources. Lower greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) and land use requirements can yield the highest benefits. But it should be regarded as a possible option in the longer term rather than an urgent solution to the current requirements needed to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
  4. The environmental impact of sourcing meat from single-cell proteins is dependent on the use of renewable energy. Considering the time required to produce a certain amount of biomass and proteins, the productivity is too low to allow production on an industrial scale. More research is required to come up with more efficient production methods.
  5. The current production of mycoprotein as a meat alternative requires a lot of energy and high-quality raw materials, which results in high GHGE and energy use impacts. Efficient production methods are also needed to explore the environmental benefits of this meat substitute.
  6. Insect biomass has potential to be a viable ingredient in a meat analog matrix. But the processing functionality of insect proteins is limited. It is suggested to combine it with plant biomass for efficient fiber texture formation.

 

The scientists recommended to conduct holistic studies to better determine the potential synergies between environmental impact and nutritional properties of meat alternatives as both factors are not linearly dependent on each other and can influence human health directly and indirectly.

 

The published review is open to the public through Resources, Conservation & Recycling.

https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=20130

 

Back      Print      View: 163

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Egypt Holds Workshop on New Biotech Applications
  • UN Agencies Urge Transformation of Food Systems
  • Taiwan strongly supports management of brown planthopper—a major threat to rice production
  • IRRI Director General enjoins ASEAN states to invest in science for global food security
  • Rabies: Educate, vaccinate and eliminate
  • “As a wife I will help, manage, and love”: The value of qualitative research in understanding land tenure and gender in Ghana
  • CIP Director General Wells Reflects on CIP’s 45th Anniversary
  • Setting the record straight on oil palm and peat in SE Asia
  • Why insect pests love monocultures, and how plant diversity could change that
  • Researchers Modify Yeast to Show How Plants Respond to Auxin
  • GM Maize MIR162 Harvested in Large Scale Field Trial in Vinh Phuc, Vietnam
  • Conference Tackles Legal Obligations and Compensation on Biosafety Regulations in Vietnam
  • Iloilo Stakeholders Informed about New Biosafety Regulations in PH
  • Global wheat and rice harvests poised to set new record
  • GM Maize Harvested in Vietnam Field Trial Sites
  • New label for mountain products puts premium on biological and cultural diversity
  • The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2016
  • Shalabh Dixit: The link between rice genes and rice farmers
  • People need affordable food, but prices must provide decent livelihoods for small-scale family farmers
  • GM Seeds Market Growth to Increase through 2020 Due to Rise in Biofuels Use

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD