Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)


- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  5
 Total visitors :  5392077

Study Finds Genome Edited Foods Found Generally Acceptable by UK Consumers
Tuesday, 2021/08/03 | 07:36:40

A review was commissioned by the Food Standards Agency to document the consumer acceptance of genome-edited foods in the United Kingdom (UK). The findings reflected that the UK consumers are open to genome-edited foods, as long as they are well-informed that these are thoroughly investigated, assessed, and labeled.


In 2018, the government of the United Kingdom disagreed with the European Court of Justice ruling that genome-edited organisms should be regulated the same way as genetically modified organisms even when the outcome was a product of traditional breeding methods. This led to an interest in reviewing the regulation of genome editing, which requires changing the definition of a GMO in legislation. A review was commissioned to complement a public consultation led by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs that ran from January to March 2021 about genetic technologies including a proposal to change the legislation to amend the definition of GMO. The objective of the review was to gather evidence on consumer interests to help inform future food policy. Likewise, it will also help inform communications with consumers if a new genome-edited food policy is introduced.


The findings of the review are:

  • Consumers tended to have low awareness and very low knowledge of genome-edited food.
  • - Consumers tend to find genome-edited food more acceptable than GM food as they perceive the former as safer and more natural. They also found GM and genome editing in plants more acceptable compared to animals.
  • - Consumers are concerned about the safety risk of genome editing to humans and animals welfare.
  • - Consumers were or became more accepting of genome editing when they are more informed, despite existing concerns.
  • - Consumers prefer the labeling of "genome-edited" in genome editing foods to inform them of the presence of genome-edited ingredients.
  • - Consumers found it appropriate to separately regulate genome-edited foods from GM foods because they are two different techniques.
  • - Consumers felt that thorough safety assessments were important, and that animal welfare rules should be strengthened as needed.
  • - Consumers want transparent labeling, and reassurance of the thoroughness of regulation and safety assessments if genome-edited foods reach the UK market.


Read the full report by the Food Standards Agency to learn more.


Back      Print      View: 26

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Beyond genes: Protein atlas scores nitrogen fixing duet
  • 2016 Borlaug CAST Communication Award Goes to Dr. Kevin Folta
  • FAO and NEPAD team up to boost rural youth employment in Benin, Cameroon, Malawi and Niger
  • Timely seed distributions in Ethiopia boost crop yields, strengthen communities’ resilience
  • Parliaments must work together in the final stretch against hunger
  • Empowering women farmers in the polder communities of Bangladesh
  • Depression: let’s talk
  • As APEC Concludes, CIP’s Food Security and Climate Smart Agriculture on Full Display
  • CIAT directly engages with the European Cocoa Industry
  • Breeding tool plays a key role in program planning
  • FAO: Transform Agriculture to Address Global Challenges
  • Uganda Holds Banana Research Training for African Scientists and Biotechnology Regulators
  • US Congress Ratifies Historic Global Food Security Treaty
  • Fruit Fly`s Genetic Code Revealed
  • Seminar at EU Parliament Tackles GM Crops Concerns
  • JICA and IRRI ignites a “seed revolution” for African and Asian farmers
  • OsABCG26 Vital in Anther Cuticle and Pollen Exine Formation in Rice
  • Akira Tanaka, IRRI’s first physiologist, passes away
  • WHO calls for immediate safe evacuation of the sick and wounded from conflict areas
  • Farmer Field School in Tonga continues to break new ground in the Pacific for training young farmers


Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD