Independence Award
- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank
Labour Award
- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank
National Award
- Study on food stuff for animal(2005)
- Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)
VIFOTEC Award
- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)
- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)
- Cassava variety KM140(2010)
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Evaluating Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) infection dynamics in rice for distribution routes and environmental reservoirs by molecular approaches
Sunday, 2025/03/23 | 06:39:41
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Onchira Ritbamrung, Phithak Inthima, Kumrop Ratanasut, Kawee Sujipuli, Tepsuda Rungrat, Kittisak Buddhachat Sci Rep.; 2025 Jan 9; 15(1):1408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85422-3. AbstractXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) is a bacterial pathogen responsible for bacterial leaf blight (BLB) in rice, which can result in significant yield losses of up to 70%. A study evaluated the spread of Xoo in rice fields using environmental samples and employed colorimetric loop-mediated amplification (cLAMP) and PCR for detection. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to measure infection levels. The research compared infection severity between a susceptible rice variety, Phitsanulok 2 (PSL2), and a resistant variety, PSL2-Xa21. Results showed that Xoo infection decreased from the leaves to the roots, but the bacteria persisted in soil and water for up to 12 and 6 weeks, respectively. The cLAMP assay, with the LpXoo4009 primer, effectively detected Xoo at low concentrations in both soil and water. Additionally, common grasses found in rice fields, such as Eriochloa procera, Echinochloa crus-galli and Chloris barbata were identified as temporary reservoirs for Xoo, facilitating its spread. The Xoo pathogen is distributed from infected leaves to roots and then from roots to the soil and nearby water. Grasses in the fields contribute to the perpetuation of the infection cycle serving as potential reservoirs that maintain the pathogen's presence in the environment.
See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39789086/
Figure 4. Infectivity of Xoo in nine varieties of grass samples within rice fields by cLAMP and PCR, confirming the identification of grass species through grouping and genetic relationship analysis with Xoo infection using a phylogenetic tree. Characteristics of the leaves of nine species of grass samples and the leaves of rice used as the control (O. sativa) after seven days of inoculation (A). Increasing amounts of DNA from grass samples using the cLAMP using LpXoo4009 primer and PCR using Xoo4009 primer by changing the color of the solution inside the test tube of cLAMP and agarose gel electrophoresis of cLAMP and PCR (B). Relationships between Xoo infection and the phylogenetic tree of grasses and rice species of rbcL gene of grass samples (C). The grass species used in this study include Eriochoa procara (G1), Echinochloa crus-galli (G2), Chloris barbata (G3), B. ischaemum (G4), Echinochloa ugandensis (G5), Dinebra chinensis (G6), Cenchrus ciliaris (G7), Digitaria ciliaris (G8), Dactyloctenium aegyptium (G9) and Oryzae sativa (control). For PCR and LAMP assay, water was used instead of DNA template as the negative control (NC). Seven grass species were infected with Xoo (dark blue bars), while the other two non-infected grass species were represented as gray bars. The other grass species were not inoculated by Xoo as indicated by light blue bars. Their sequences were retrieved from GenBank for constructing the phylogenetic tree. The grouping of gels was cropped from different gels and their original images are in Supplementary Information 1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
|