Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  6
 Total visitors :  8180599

Industry Stakeholders in Scotland Call on Government to Consider Precision Breeding Technology
Friday, 2024/11/08 | 08:07:17

ISAAA October 30, 2024

Industry stakeholders NFU Scotland, Agricultural Industries Confederation, and GB Potatoes call upon the Scottish Government to establish an independent expert working group to consider the key issues about Precision Breeding technology. 

 

In a letter addressed to the Government, the stakeholders state that the working group should consider the range of issues and evidence covering scientific application, comparing international regulatory developments, trade impacts, cost of enforcing divergent GE policies, impact on agricultural productivity, and impacts on EU alignment. They emphasized that considering the issues would ensure they are not left behind in this vital area of innovation.

 

The stakeholders also cite that in Scotland, there are unique pests and diseases with local research institutions and plant breeding businesses to help address them.  Precision breeding has the potential to play a key role in contributing to key Scottish Government policies, including reducing emissions from agricultural production, growing the Scottish agricultural economy, and contributing to food security through ensuring resilient domestic food and feed supply. They urge the Government to consider the issue and not to ignore the vast potential benefits of this established technology. "We should be clear that Precision Breeding is not the same as Genetic Modification, and there are clear differences between the two," the letter stated.

 

For more details, read the letter in NFU Scotland.

See https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/ged/article/default.asp?ID=21066

 

Back      Print      View: 109

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Beyond genes: Protein atlas scores nitrogen fixing duet
  • 2016 Borlaug CAST Communication Award Goes to Dr. Kevin Folta
  • FAO and NEPAD team up to boost rural youth employment in Benin, Cameroon, Malawi and Niger
  • Timely seed distributions in Ethiopia boost crop yields, strengthen communities’ resilience
  • Parliaments must work together in the final stretch against hunger
  • Empowering women farmers in the polder communities of Bangladesh
  • Depression: let’s talk
  • As APEC Concludes, CIP’s Food Security and Climate Smart Agriculture on Full Display
  • CIAT directly engages with the European Cocoa Industry
  • Breeding tool plays a key role in program planning
  • FAO: Transform Agriculture to Address Global Challenges
  • Uganda Holds Banana Research Training for African Scientists and Biotechnology Regulators
  • US Congress Ratifies Historic Global Food Security Treaty
  • Fruit Fly`s Genetic Code Revealed
  • Seminar at EU Parliament Tackles GM Crops Concerns
  • JICA and IRRI ignites a “seed revolution” for African and Asian farmers
  • OsABCG26 Vital in Anther Cuticle and Pollen Exine Formation in Rice
  • Akira Tanaka, IRRI’s first physiologist, passes away
  • WHO calls for immediate safe evacuation of the sick and wounded from conflict areas
  • Farmer Field School in Tonga continues to break new ground in the Pacific for training young farmers

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD