Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  7
 Total visitors :  8517522

Industry Stakeholders in Scotland Call on Government to Consider Precision Breeding Technology
Friday, 2024/11/08 | 08:07:17

ISAAA October 30, 2024

Industry stakeholders NFU Scotland, Agricultural Industries Confederation, and GB Potatoes call upon the Scottish Government to establish an independent expert working group to consider the key issues about Precision Breeding technology. 

 

In a letter addressed to the Government, the stakeholders state that the working group should consider the range of issues and evidence covering scientific application, comparing international regulatory developments, trade impacts, cost of enforcing divergent GE policies, impact on agricultural productivity, and impacts on EU alignment. They emphasized that considering the issues would ensure they are not left behind in this vital area of innovation.

 

The stakeholders also cite that in Scotland, there are unique pests and diseases with local research institutions and plant breeding businesses to help address them.  Precision breeding has the potential to play a key role in contributing to key Scottish Government policies, including reducing emissions from agricultural production, growing the Scottish agricultural economy, and contributing to food security through ensuring resilient domestic food and feed supply. They urge the Government to consider the issue and not to ignore the vast potential benefits of this established technology. "We should be clear that Precision Breeding is not the same as Genetic Modification, and there are clear differences between the two," the letter stated.

 

For more details, read the letter in NFU Scotland.

See https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/ged/article/default.asp?ID=21066

 

Back      Print      View: 183

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • EFSA Concludes GM Maize MON 95379 Safe
  • FAO Pushes for Transformation of Agri-food Systems to Address Climate Crisis
  • New Height-Reducing Gene Can Help Wheat Grow in Drier Soil
  • Science Communication Expert Hailed as One of the Filipino Faces of Biotechnology
  • Global Leaders Tackle Conservation at UN Biodiversity Conference
  • ARS Introduces Improved Winter Peas for Food Use
  • EFSA GMO Panel Concludes GM Maize MON 87429 Safe as Conventional Counterpart
  • Codex Alimentarius Commission Adopts New Food Safety Standards
  • Philippines Celebrate 18th National Biotech Week
  • Tomatoes Can Now Come in Customized Colors Thanks to CRISPR
  • Scientists Use Virus for Bacterial Base Editing
  • Targeted Modification of Rice Genome with Base Editing
  • Philippines Continues Biotech Lead in Southeast Asia - USDA FAS Report
  • Researchers Develop an Optimized CRISPR tool for Tobacco
  • Restoring the Red Seed Coat in Rice through Genome Editing
  • Crown-of-thorns seastar named after WorldFish scientist
  • ISAAA Inc., SEARCA Launches Policy Briefs on Philippine Biosafety Regulations As Part of the National Biotechnology Week Celebration
  • GRDC and Partners Target to Boost Wheat`s Heat Tolerance
  • EFSA Finds No New Hazards for GM Cotton 281-24-236 × 3006-210-23
  • Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) Technology

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD