Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)


- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  3
 Total visitors :  5288726

Time to break free from the `yield gap trap`
Wednesday, 2014/10/01 | 08:14:24

CIAT 2014 by Stephanie Malyon



When we see a gap, be it physically in front of us or figuratively speaking, we are compelled to find a way to mind it, to fill it, to close it.

When we talk about the yield gap – the difference between actual crop yields and those potentially attainable in a given region – in the agricultural research and development world the same knee-jerk reaction compels us – “must close the gap!”


CIATs new strategic initiative to reduce yield gaps for sustainable intensification of agriculture is kicking-off by stepping back and asking some vital questions to help us rethink yield gaps and consider socio-economic constraints and whole system productivity. Who wants to close the gap and why? Specifically whose yield gap do we want to address? Are we asking the right questions to the right people? Do we have the idea of “closing” the gap and limiting the discussion to a “yield” gap all wrong?

Rethinking the yield gap is the only way to avoid falling into the “yield gap trap”. Photo by Neil Palmer/CIAT


Rethinking an old concept

Closing the yield gap is not a new concept. The idea of increasing yields and improving the genetic potential of crops and livestock has been around since the beginnings of agronomy and breeding. The yield gap term itself was coined some 30 years ago. But despite decades of work, we are still trying to close the yield gap for staple crops (maize, rice, wheat, cassava, beans) all over the world.


Global food security is calculated based on how many million tons of (staple) food is produced. Therefore, the current yield gap debate is perpetuated by development agencies, governments, and NGOs revolving around national and global food security discussions and the need to feed our rapidly growing population projected to reach 9 billion by 2050.  But are smallholder farmers really concerned about commodity yield gaps? Are we all speaking the same language?


We should not get trapped in the mindset that the food security of a smallholder means a large, beautiful maize field that provides enough food for the whole family, while excluding alternative income options, diversification or specialization. Not to be misunderstood, individual farmers certainly would be delighted to achieve high(er) yields of the commodities they grow – maize and beans in sub-Saharan Africa for example. But, at what cost and risk?


Weighing pros and cons and considering a multitude of constraining factors simultaneously, farmers might be more concerned about the crops or livestock that bring in the most cash, i.e. those crops that we might be promoting for crop diversification or linking farmers to markets. A clear illustration is the smallholders in Lushoto, Tanzania, who reserve the fertile valley bottom land for producing cash-crops like tomato and cabbages, while getting low yields from maize planted on steep and degraded hill slopes. In other words, smallholders are more concerned with improving the performance and productivity of their whole farm and their livelihoods, including off-farm activities and income. This is what we like to call the “farm gap.”


Smallholders in Lushoto, Tanzania, reserve the fertile valley bottom land for producing cash-crops. Photo by Johnathan Stonehouse (Flickr)


Exploring the farm gap holistically


So where does this leave the yield gap debate and related research? Let’s not get trapped in a narrow-minded, single commodity yield gap debate and move forward to explore what a bottom-up, holistic approach looks like!


We aren’t suggesting abandoning past work on traditional agronomy and breeding; traditional approaches to “closing” the gap including sound agronomy, natural resource management and improved varieties are pieces of the puzzle. But, taken forward in isolation – without a clear understanding of smallholder realities – they often don’t achieve the profound and lasting impact that researchers were hoping for.


The farm gap approach forces us to put farmer decision-making at the center. At the same time, being concerned with the sustainability of smallholder production systems, there is no way we can ignore adding eco-efficiency into the equation. Such a holistic approach embraces the complexity and diversity of on and off-farm links with income, labor and resources. We strive to address farmer risk and vulnerability and farmer perceptions of production. We move beyond the field scale of the yield gap to a multi-scale approach across a landscape. Instead of being driven by the national and global agenda of general food security, the farm gap addresses multiple levels from the household up. This all lies within a context of ecosystem services and sustainability that must be addressed.


We will embrace this complexity and tackle our research questions from the farmers’ perspectives, to integrate their desires and perceptions. We want to know how taking this holistic, multi-scale, interdisciplinary, eco-efficient farm gap approach helps sustainably and better address food security and livelihoods. At the same time, we believe that these insights will be crucial for governments and global players to identify entry-points for shaping policies or targeting interventions with the aim to increase the production of staple crops, if this is what these stakeholders want to pursue.


The way forward

Now the big question is: how to put this new approach into action?

We have already laid the foundations with our work in breeding, agronomy, modeling, integrated pest and disease management, assessment mapping and management of soil fertility. Now it’s time to integrate these with our socio-economic, governance, landscape health, ecosystem services and “big data” expertise.


Rethinking the yield gap is the only way to avoid falling into the “yield gap trap”.

There are some immediate, no-regret options to increase farm productivity, such as adopting improved varieties or using available farm resources more efficiently, and we can start there testing out our new approach.

Back      Print      View: 2693

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Relative Expression of Xa7 Controls Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistance
  • Stimulating Innovation in Plant Genetic Resources, Brussels, Belgium
  • International Team Sequences Genome of Sweet Orange
  • Scientists Sequence Vietnamese Rice Genome
  • New Promising Cowpea Varieties for Africa and Rest of the World
  • NACGRAB Director: GM Crops are Safe
  • Tanzanian Stakeholders Call for Modern Cotton Production
  • 3rd International Symposium on Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources
  • Scientists Say Without Adequate Funding, Deadly Wheat Disease Could Threaten World's Food Supply
  • Researchers Find Details of Healthy Compounds in Colorful Whole Grain Rice
  • AUSVEG National Convention
  • Global Economic Benefits of GM Crops Reach Almost $100 Billion
  • Early Maturing Maize Lines Hold Drought Tolerance that could Save African Farmers
  • B4FA Releases Book on Future of Africa and Contribution of Biosciences
  • South Dakota State University Developing Drought Tolerant Wheat
  • UK Chief Scientist says GM Crops' Case Becoming Stronger
  • Global Value of Biotech Rice
  • International Team Develops Physical Map of Wheat's Wild Ancestor
  • Cassavabase, an open access database on Cassava Research
  • BTI scientist co-leads kiwifruit genome sequencing project


Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD