Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  1
 Total visitors :  7516592

EU Court of Justice Advocate General Says Gene Edited Crops Should be Exempted from GM Food Laws
Friday, 2018/02/02 | 07:15:53

In his Opinion on Case C-528/16, Advocate General of the European Court of Justice Michal Bobek said that organisms obtained by mutagenesis are, in principle, exempted from the obligations in the Genetically Modified Organisms Directive of the European Parliament (GMO Directive). The GMO Directive regulates the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their placing on the market within the EU.

 

The Opinion Case said that the Directive does not, however, apply to organisms obtained through certain techniques of genetic modification, such as mutagenesis (‘the mutagenesis exemption'). Unlike transgenesis, mutagenesis does not, in principle, entail the insertion of foreign DNA into a living organism.

 

The Advocate General first considers that an organism obtained by mutagenesis can be a GMO if it fulfills the substantive criteria laid down in the GMO Directive. He observes that the Directive does not require the insertion of foreign DNA in an organism in order for the latter to be considered as a GMO, but merely says that the genetic material has been altered in such a way that does not occur naturally. The Opinion Case also indicated that Member States can legislate with regard to organisms obtained by mutagenesis.

 

The first reaction to the Opinion Case came from the European Plant Science Organisation (EPSO), which states that it welcomes the Advocate General's opinion, and that it is an important step in clarifying the European Directive concerning organisms modified by recent mutagenesis techniques that appeared after 2001.

 

For more details, read the Opinion Case and EPSO's reaction.

Back      Print      View: 343

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Beyond genes: Protein atlas scores nitrogen fixing duet
  • 2016 Borlaug CAST Communication Award Goes to Dr. Kevin Folta
  • FAO and NEPAD team up to boost rural youth employment in Benin, Cameroon, Malawi and Niger
  • Timely seed distributions in Ethiopia boost crop yields, strengthen communities’ resilience
  • Parliaments must work together in the final stretch against hunger
  • Empowering women farmers in the polder communities of Bangladesh
  • Depression: let’s talk
  • As APEC Concludes, CIP’s Food Security and Climate Smart Agriculture on Full Display
  • CIAT directly engages with the European Cocoa Industry
  • Breeding tool plays a key role in program planning
  • FAO: Transform Agriculture to Address Global Challenges
  • Uganda Holds Banana Research Training for African Scientists and Biotechnology Regulators
  • US Congress Ratifies Historic Global Food Security Treaty
  • Fruit Fly`s Genetic Code Revealed
  • Seminar at EU Parliament Tackles GM Crops Concerns
  • JICA and IRRI ignites a “seed revolution” for African and Asian farmers
  • OsABCG26 Vital in Anther Cuticle and Pollen Exine Formation in Rice
  • Akira Tanaka, IRRI’s first physiologist, passes away
  • WHO calls for immediate safe evacuation of the sick and wounded from conflict areas
  • Farmer Field School in Tonga continues to break new ground in the Pacific for training young farmers

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD