Welcome To Website IAS

Hot news
Achievement

Independence Award

- First Rank - Second Rank - Third Rank

Labour Award

- First Rank - Second Rank -Third Rank

National Award

 - Study on food stuff for animal(2005)

 - Study on rice breeding for export and domestic consumption(2005)

VIFOTEC Award

- Hybrid Maize by Single Cross V2002 (2003)

- Tomato Grafting to Manage Ralstonia Disease(2005)

- Cassava variety KM140(2010)

Centres
Website links
Vietnamese calendar
Library
Visitors summary
 Curently online :  3
 Total visitors :  7516943

The royal society report says uk public cautiously optimistic about genetic technologies
Thursday, 2018/04/12 | 07:57:54

The UK public is cautiously optimistic about the use of technologies such as DNA sequencing, gene therapy and genome editing to help tackle global challenges like improving human health, reducing inequality and responding to the impacts of climate change. The Royal Society commissioned a public dialogue to explore UK views on genetic technologies applied to people, plants, and animals, and to probe some of the dilemmas and debates around their use.

 

In a survey of 2,061 people, 46% indicated that they agreed with the statement that ‘genome editing in general carries too many risks to be used to tackle global challenges', and the public is very positive about its use in specific areas such as human health. There is support for using genome editing in plants to produce cheaper medicines (69%), make crops more nutritious as a way of supplementing poor diets (70%), and to prevent crop damage, for example by fungal diseases (77%).

 

There is also support for the use of genome editing in animals to prevent or cure human disease. For example, 71% of survey participants approve of using genetically modified mosquitoes to limit the spread of malaria.

 

About 43% of survey respondents ranked university academics, scientists and researchers as the most trustworthy to provide information and advice about genetic technologies. This view was backed up by participants in the survey's accompanying workshops, who saw this group as having greater impartiality. Businesses working on or funding research on genetic technologies ranked as the second most trusted (16%), closely followed by government bodies/policy makers (14%), and regulatory organizations (12%).

 

For more, read the news article in The Royal Society website.

Back      Print      View: 369

[ Other News ]___________________________________________________
  • Brazil offers an extra US $ 17 million to FAO projects as new government takes helm
  • 2014 in review – Another busy year
  • Growing concern for South Sudan`s herders as conflict displaces millions of cattle
  • Biotech and Traditional Farming are Compatible Approaches to Sustainable Agri, Study
  • Report: Weed Control Changes and Herbicide Tolerant Crops in the USA 1996-2012
  • New Study Provides Better Understanding of the Genetic Basis for Drought Tolerant Soybeans
  • Wheat Gene Increases Blight Resistance of American Chestnut Trees
  • China Approves Imports of Biotech Crops
  • IndoBIC Holds Media Visit to Seed Industries in East Java
  • FAO food price index drops in December
  • Origin Receives Biosafety Certificate Renewal for its GM Phytase Corn in China
  • Biotech Rice Expressing CP4-EPSPS Shows Glyphosate Tolerance
  • UK Govt Adviser Calls for Use of Agri Technologies that ``Produce More with Less``
  • Genetic diversity a hidden tool in coping with climate change
  • Cutting down on Amazon deforestation: Watch, think, and act
  • USDA Deregulates Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton and Soybean
  • NAS Holds Workshop on Communicating about GMOs
  • Cell Wall Traits for a FHB Resistant Durum Wheat
  • Ag Biotech Vietnam Conducts Biotech Quiz Contest at Northwestern University
  • Viet Nam Launches National Zero Hunger Challenge

 

Designed & Powered by WEBSO CO.,LTD