Joey R. Bernhardt and Mary I. O’Connor

PNAS April 13, 2021 118 (15) e1917487118

Significance

Food security is not simply about maintaining yields, but it is also about the need for a stable supply of nutritionally diverse foods. Obtaining nutritious food is a major challenge facing humanity, and diverse aquatic ecosystems can help meet this goal. To test how aquatic biodiversity affects human health, we assembled a dataset of nutrients, contaminants, and ecological traits of 801 aquatic species. We used ecological models to quantify the role of species richness and ecological functional diversity and found that these biodiversity dimensions enhanced seafood micronutrient and fatty acid provisioning by the same mechanisms that link biodiversity to productivity in grasslands, forests, and other systems. Our results underscore the need to minimize aquatic biodiversity loss to sustain and improve human well-being.

Abstract

Humanity depends on biodiversity for health, well-being, and a stable environment. As biodiversity change accelerates, we are still discovering the full range of consequences for human health and well-being. Here, we test the hypothesis—derived from biodiversity–ecosystem functioning theory—that species richness and ecological functional diversity allow seafood diets to fulfill multiple nutritional requirements, a condition necessary for human health. We analyzed a newly synthesized dataset of 7,245 observations of nutrient and contaminant concentrations in 801 aquatic animal taxa and found that species with different ecological traits have distinct and complementary micronutrient profiles but little difference in protein content. The same complementarity mechanisms that generate positive biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems also operate in seafood assemblages, allowing more diverse diets to yield increased nutritional benefits independent of total biomass consumed. Notably, nutritional metrics that capture multiple micronutrients and fatty acids essential for human well-being depend more strongly on biodiversity than common ecological measures of function such as productivity, typically reported for grasslands and forests. Furthermore, we found that increasing species richness did not increase the amount of protein in seafood diets and also increased concentrations of toxic metal contaminants in the diet. Seafood-derived micronutrients and fatty acids are important for human health and are a pillar of global food and nutrition security. By drawing upon biodiversity–ecosystem functioning theory, we demonstrate that ecological concepts of biodiversity can deepen our understanding of nature’s benefits to people and unite sustainability goals for biodiversity and human well-being.

See https://www.pnas.org/content/118/15/e1917487118

Figure 1:

Aquatic biodiversity increases human well-being because edible species have distinct and complementary multinutrient profiles (A) and differ in mean micro- and macronutrient content (shown here relative to 10 and 25% thresholds of recommended dietary allowance, RDA, guidelines) for representative finfish (Abramis brama, Mullus surmuletus), mollusc (Mytilus galloprovincialis), and crustacean species (Nephrops norvegicus). Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning theory predicts that nutritional benefits, including the number of nutrient RDA targets met per 100 g portion (NT; i, iii) and minimum portion size (P_min; ii, iv) (B and E), are enhanced with increasing seafood species richness. Orange dots in B and E correspond to potential diets of high and low biodiversity levels. Seafood consumers with limited access to seafood each day may not reach RDA targets if diets are low in diversity (D–F versus A–C; gray shading indicates proportion of population that meets nutrient requirements). DHA: docosahexaenoic acid, EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid.